Mikel Arteta finds himself at the center of growing criticism as Arsenal struggles to maintain consistency in front of goal. The Gunners’ recent attacking issues stem from a surprising tactical decision—Arteta’s insistence on using Kai Havertz, a natural midfielder, as his main striker while ignoring a player who is a complete forward.
Many fans and analysts believe that Arteta has a proven striker at his disposal, yet he continues to overlook him in favor of Havertz, whose preferred role is deeper in midfield. This has led to a lack of fluidity in Arsenal’s attack, with the team failing to convert chances at crucial moments.
Havertz, though talented, has not displayed the clinical finishing instincts of a natural No. 9. His movement and decision-making in the final third often reflect his midfield tendencies rather than those of a lethal striker. Arsenal’s inability to consistently capitalize on goal-scoring opportunities has resulted in dropped points, frustrating supporters who see an obvious solution being ignored.
Arteta’s philosophy is built on positional flexibility, but playing individuals out of their natural roles can have its drawbacks. The club has a history of struggling with finishing problems, and this season has been no different. With a proper striker leading the line, Arsenal’s attack could become far more effective.
As the season progresses, Arteta may be forced to reconsider his approach. The pressure is mounting, and with top-four ambitions in mind, he cannot afford to keep experimenting at the expense of valuable points. Arsenal fans will be hoping that common sense prevails and that the right players are deployed in their strongest positions before it’s too late.
Post a Comment